January 5, 2026
Trade Ideas

CleanSpark: Cheap Relative to Asset Base, Levered to Bitcoin Upside and AI Data-center Optionality

A high-conviction long swing with tight risk controls — buy for upside to $22 if Bitcoin and AI demand continue to accelerate

Loading...
Loading quote...
Direction
Long
Time Horizon
Swing
Risk Level
High

Summary

CleanSpark (CLSK) looks materially undervalued on a simple asset/equity basis and is posting an earnings inflection driven by higher mining realizations and capacity additions. The balance sheet is large (assets $3.10B; equity $2.15B as of 06/30/2025) and operating profitability in the latest quarter swung meaningfully positive (Q3 FY2025 operating income $246.2M, net income available to common $257.4M). With management pushing into AI/HPC-ready data-center capacity, the stock has a plausible multiple expansion path if bitcoin prices stay firm and AI demand proves sticky. This is a high-risk trade that pays to size properly and use a defined stop-loss.

Key Points

Q3 FY2025 (04/01/2025 - 06/30/2025) revenue $198.6M; operating income $246.2M; net income available to common $257.4M (filed 08/07/2025).
Assets $3.10B and equity $2.15B as of 06/30/2025; long-term debt $643.9M.
Implied market cap estimate roughly $3.25B - $3.76B using reported share counts and recent price ~$11.55; book value per basic share ~ $7.64.
Trade plan: long at $11.00 - $12.50, stop $9.00, targets $16 (near), $22 (medium), $30+ (bull).

Hook / Thesis

CleanSpark is a capital-intensive operator that until recently focused almost exclusively on bitcoin mining. The last quarter shows exactly why you should care: in Q3 (04/01/2025 - 06/30/2025) the company reported revenues of $198.6M and an operating income of $246.2M, producing net income available to common shareholders of $257.4M for the period (filed 08/07/2025). Those are big headline numbers for a name that trades near the low double-digits. On a simple balance-sheet basis the company carries assets of $3.10B and equity of $2.15B as of 06/30/2025, which supports an argument that the market has not fully priced in either the demonstrated earnings upside or the optionality from repurposing data-center capacity for AI/HPC work.

Why the market should care

There are two separate, compounding fundamental drivers here. First, CleanSpark is levered to the bitcoin cycle: mining revenue and EBITDA move with network difficulty and BTC price, and Q3 FY2025 shows the business can produce significant profitability when conditions are favorable - Q3 gross profit was $108.5M and operating income was $246.2M. Second, management is building scalable, energy-efficient digital infrastructure that can be configured for higher-value AI/HPC workloads, not only mining. If the company converts even a fraction of its excess capacity or pipeline into AI hosting, incremental revenue per MW could exceed what mining delivers, creating a visible re-rating path.


Business snapshot

CleanSpark describes itself as a data center developer with a reporting segment focused on bitcoin mining; it provides scalable, energy-efficient digital infrastructure across the U.S. Recent quarterly results (period ending 06/30/2025, filed 08/07/2025) show:

  • Revenues: $198.6M
  • Gross profit: $108.5M
  • Operating income: $246.2M
  • Net income attributable to parent: $257.4M
  • Depreciation & amortization: $94.9M
  • Net cash flow from operating activities (quarter): -$109.9M

On the balance sheet (06/30/2025): total assets $3.10B, current assets $1.21B, equity attributable to parent $2.15B, and long-term debt $643.9M. Those are sizable numbers for a business with a share price hovering in the low-teens and make for a straightforward valuation juxtaposition (more below).


How the numbers support the thesis

Look at the Q3 P&L and cash-flow dynamics together. The company posted a quarterly net income of $251.6M (net income loss line $251,564,000) and net income available to common stockholders of $257.4M. That magnitude of earnings in a single quarter demonstrates the asymmetry: when bitcoin economics are favorable, CleanSpark can generate large GAAP profits thanks to inventory of fixed assets (compute, racks, power) the company already owns and depreciates. Depreciation & amortization was $94.9M in the quarter — a non-cash charge — which means operating cash flow over time could look even cleaner when mining cash receipts are stable.

Cash flow is choppy because the company is in growth mode: net cash flow from investing activities was -$125.3M in the quarter while financing provided $172.8M, leaving net cash flow for the quarter at -$62.4M. That fits a capital deployment story: expanding capacity while balancing leverage. Long-term debt sits at $643.9M, and equity of $2.15B gives a comfortable-looking capital base if bitcoin revenue continues.


Valuation framing

The dataset does not include an explicit market capitalization, but there are share counts in the filings that allow a reasonable estimate. Q3 diluted average shares were 325,594,451 and basic average shares were 280,997,649. Using the recent intraday price near $11.55 (most recent close shown 11.55), implied market cap is roughly:

  • Using basic shares: 280,997,649 * $11.55 ≈ $3.25B
  • Using diluted shares: 325,594,451 * $11.55 ≈ $3.76B

Compare that to book value: equity attributable to parent was $2.1469B as of 06/30/2025. Dividing equity by the basic share count gives book value per basic share ~ $7.64 ($2.1469B / 281M). The stock is trading more like a modest premium to book (~50% above book on a per-basic-share basis), but is still inexpensive relative to many high-growth data center or AI infra names — and importantly it carries embedded bitcoin exposure that could swing earnings higher.

Valuation takeaway: at an implied enterprise value that is only a few billion dollars, investors are effectively getting a large, on‑balance-sheet infrastructure footprint (assets $3.10B, fixed assets $1.3293B) plus the optionality to sell or repurpose capacity into AI/HPC, while still remaining levered to bitcoin economics. If BTC rises, margins can expand quickly; if AI demand materializes, that creates a second, higher-margin growth vector. The market appears to be valuing the company conservatively against both scenarios today.


Catalysts (2-5)

  • Bitcoin price appreciation and favorable mining economics - directly lifts revenue and EBITDA and could drive further positive GAAP quarters.
  • Announcements of AI/HPC hosting contracts or MW commitments - proof the company can commercialize higher-value use cases for its power-dense sites.
  • Capacity additions or efficiency upgrades that increase hash rate per dollar invested, improving return on capital.
  • Strategic partnership or sale/leaseback of data-center capacity to monetize asset value and accelerate deleveraging.

Trade plan (actionable)

This is a high-risk, asymmetric long where you size entry and stops carefully.

  • Trade direction: Long
  • Time horizon: Swing (several weeks to a few months) with a position holder view if catalysts pan out
  • Suggested entry: Scale in between $11.00 - $12.50. The recent intraday prints show activity around $11.59 - $11.55; buying the dip below $12 keeps valuation upside intact.
  • Stop-loss: $9.00 hard stop (about 22% from $11.50). If price closes below $9 on heavy volume, the market is pricing a materially worse BTC/asset outcome and risk of de-rating increases.
  • Targets:
    • Target 1 (near-term): $16.00 - tactical bounce / re-rate on a strong BTC move or positive AI contract - ~40% upside from $11.50.
    • Target 2 (medium-term): $22.00 - reflects a meaningful multiple expansion if Q4 prints continued strong profitability and there is early AI/HPC monetization.
    • Target 3 (bull case): $30.00+ - if bitcoin rallies substantially and AI/HPC revenue scaling is confirmed, multiple and growth could push valuation into a higher peer-comparison band.
  • Position sizing: Treat as a satellite position: single-digit percent of risk capital. High volatility; use options or partial sizing if available.

Risks and counterarguments

Key risks:

  • Bitcoin dependency: Mining revenue is cyclical and highly correlated with BTC price and network difficulty. A prolonged BTC drawdown would hit revenue and cash flows fast and could force asset sales or equity raises.
  • Execution risk on AI/HPC pivot: Repurposing mining sites to host AI workloads requires different sales cycles, higher SLAs, and possibly capex to support GPU hosting. There is no guarantee customers show up at the needed scale or at favorable economics.
  • Cash-flow/capital intensity: Operating cash flow for the quarter was negative (-$109.9M) despite GAAP profits. The firm is using financing to fund investing; if financing markets tighten or costs of capital rise, growth plans could stall.
  • Leverage and interest-rate sensitivity: Long-term debt of $643.9M is material; weaker EBITDA or higher borrowing costs would pressure margins and financial flexibility.
  • Regulatory and energy risks: Mining faces regulatory scrutiny and local permitting/energy availability constraints; any adverse changes could impact operations or incremental capacity builds.

Counterargument to our thesis (what skeptics will say):

Critics will point out that CleanSpark is a bitcoin-mining play first and foremost; any AI/HPC optionality is speculative and may never generate material revenue. Given the volatility in BTC, a conservative multiple is justified and the balance-sheet numbers do not mitigate operational cyclicality.

How I weigh that counterargument: It’s valid. The pivot to AI/HPC is optionality, not proven recurring revenue today. That’s why the trade is size-sensitive and stop-defined. However, the recent quarter shows the company can generate outsized GAAP profit in favorable environments, and the balance sheet provides a runway. If AI contracts are announced, optionality converts to tangible earnings power; if not, the company remains exposed to bitcoin cycles but with real asset backing.


What would change my mind

I would materially downgrade the trade thesis if any of the following occur:

  • Q4 and subsequent quarters show a sustained collapse in mining revenue with no path to rebuild EBITDA, combined with cash burn that forces dilutive equity raises.
  • Management abandons AI/HPC ambitions publicly or fails to secure any commercial contracts within the next 3-6 quarters.
  • Balance-sheet deterioration: a meaningful increase in long-term debt without commensurate asset monetization or a deterioration of current assets/liabilities signaling liquidity stress.

Conversely, my bullish stance would be strengthened if the company publishes firm AI customer commitments, reports sequential improvement in operating cash flow, or management announces value-accretive monetization of assets (e.g., sale/leaseback, JV with hyperscalers).


Conclusion

CleanSpark is a volatile but interesting asymmetric idea. The company has a large asset base (assets $3.10B, equity $2.15B as of 06/30/2025) and just delivered a quarter with strong GAAP profits (Q3 operating income $246.2M; net income available to common $257.4M). At recent prices around $11.50 the stock implies a market value in the low-to-mid single-digit billions (estimate $3.25B - $3.76B depending on share count used), leaving room for upside if bitcoin economics remain supportive or if AI/HPC hosting demand materializes.

This is a high-risk, potentially high-reward swing trade: buy the $11.00 - $12.50 range, use a $9.00 stop, and consider targets at $16 and $22 with a bull case to $30 if multiple positive catalysts align. Size this as a satellite position and monitor BTC price, operating cash flow, and any AI/HPC contract announcements closely. If those ingredients turn, CleanSpark could move from a pure-cycle miner to a diversified digital infrastructure play with a materially higher valuation multiple.

Disclosure: This is not financial advice. Do your own due diligence and size positions according to your risk tolerance.

Risks
  • High revenue cyclicality tied to Bitcoin price and network difficulty.
  • Execution risk converting mining sites into AI/HPC data-center revenue streams.
  • Negative operating cash flow in the quarter (-$109.9M) despite GAAP profit; capital intensity requires external financing.
  • Material long-term debt ($643.9M) which raises interest-rate and leverage risk if revenues decline.
Disclosure
Not financial advice. The article uses company filings and public price data; investors should do their own research and size positions to risk tolerance.
Search Articles
Category
Trade Ideas

Actionable trade ideas with entry/stop/target and risk framing.

Related Articles
Buy the Dip in Newmont (NEM): A Tactical Long on Levered Gold Exposure

Newmont is the world’s largest gold producer with a diversified portfolio and improving cash gener...

Coherent: Volatility Is The Price - AI Optics Could Be The Payoff

Coherent reported another quarter of revenue and EPS beats on 02/04/2026, but the stock is trading a...

Buy the Shock: Tactical Long on JAKKS Pacific After Volatility

JAKKS Pacific posted a jaw-dropping Q3 that looks scary headline-first but reveals durable gross mar...

Encompass Health: Buy the Franchise, Manage the Legal Noise

Encompass Health (EHC) combines durable operating cash flow, steady revenue (~$5.9B in FY2025) and a...

NGL Energy Partners - Growth Is Driving the Rally; Leverage Keeps Valuation In Check

NGL has rallied from the low single digits to near $12 on accelerating revenues and strong operating...

Energy Transfer: Ride the Natural-Gas Tailwind Driven by AI Data Centers

Energy Transfer (ET) is a large, diversified midstream operator sitting squarely in the path of two ...