Marjorie Taylor Greene Criticizes Trump’s Venezuela Operation as Contrary to America First Principles
January 4, 2026
Business News

Marjorie Taylor Greene Criticizes Trump’s Venezuela Operation as Contrary to America First Principles

Georgia Representative Questions Focus on Venezuela Amid Drug Trafficking Concerns Linked to Mexican Cartels

Summary

Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene publicly condemned the Trump administration’s military strike in Venezuela and the capture of President Nicolás Maduro, labeling the action inconsistent with the 'America First' agenda. She emphasized that the operation diverts attention from Mexican cartels, which she identifies as the primary source of fentanyl deaths in the U.S. Greene’s remarks underscore divisions within the Republican Party concerning the administration's strategy in Venezuela and its implications for U.S. foreign policy and domestic priorities.

Key Points

Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene publicly criticized the Trump administration’s military operation in Venezuela and the capture of President Nicolás Maduro, labeling it inconsistent with the 'America First' agenda.
Greene argued that if combating drug trafficking were a true priority, the administration would target Mexican cartels, which are linked to most fentanyl-related deaths in the United States rather than Venezuela.
She accused the operation of serving corporate and oil industry interests instead of the American people, emphasizing her interpretation of America First as prioritizing U.S. citizens.
Her comments reflect a growing divide within the Republican Party regarding Trump's actions in Venezuela, with some supporting the operation as a show of strength and others warning of potential long-term consequences.
On a recent Sunday, Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia escalated her public opposition to the Trump administration’s military incursion into Venezuela and the apprehension of President Nicolás Maduro, characterizing the move as a betrayal of the "America First" ideology that propelled President Donald Trump’s electoral success.

During an interview on NBC's "Meet the Press," Greene asserted that the administration’s actions against Venezuela conflicted with the "America First" slogan central to Trump's campaign under the banner of Make America Great Again. She challenged the justification for the strike, which targeted what was described as "narco-terrorists," arguing that if the President was genuinely intent on combating drug trafficking, the focus should be directed elsewhere, specifically toward Mexican cartels.

Greene, known for her firm stance on immigration issues, highlighted that the predominant source of fentanyl-related fatalities in the United States is linked to Mexican criminal organizations rather than Venezuelan entities. She expressed skepticism about the administration's rationale, implying that the operation might serve interests beyond the American public.

On the program, Greene contended, "This is the same Washington playbook that we are so sick and tired of that doesn't serve the American people, that actually serves the big corporations, the banks, and the oil executives." She delineated her definition of America First as a policy focused squarely on benefiting the American populace.

Her televised remarks followed a series of social media posts on the platform currently known as X, wherein she underscored the fentanyl trafficking driven by drug cartels and questioned why, if the goal was to save American lives, the administration had not leveraged U.S. resources against these groups.

This expression of dissent within the Republican ranks reveals growing friction concerning Trump's decision to conduct a military operation in Venezuela, capture its president, and assert that the United States will "run" the country to access its extensive oil reserves. Recent reporting highlighted that Trump framed this initiative as consistent with his America First mandate to secure energy resources and foster regional stability.

The Venezuela raid has drawn support from numerous prominent Republicans and many within Trump's core base, who view it as a demonstration of U.S. strength. Conversely, Democrats and certain civil liberties advocates caution that such intervention rekindles memories of previous U.S. actions in Latin America and could entangle the country in a prolonged occupation.

It should be noted that Greene declared her intent to resign from Congress last November, following internal disagreements with President Trump surrounding the release of documents related to Jeffrey Epstein and the expiration of healthcare subsidies. Her official departure is set for Monday, January 5.

Greene’s position highlights a distinctive voice in the ongoing debate over foreign policy priorities and the strategic orientation of America's engagement in Latin America, specifically regarding the allocation of military and political resources relative to domestic issues such as drug trafficking.
Risks
  • The military strike on Venezuela risks provoking extended U.S. involvement or occupation, as cautioned by some political and civil liberties groups.
  • The operation may deepen divides within the Republican Party, potentially impacting party unity and future policy consensus.
  • The focus on Venezuela could detract from addressing domestic drug trafficking issues, particularly those involving Mexican cartels, potentially undermining efforts to reduce fentanyl-related fatalities in the U.S.
Disclosure
Education only / not financial advice
Search Articles
Category
Business News

Business News

Ticker Sentiment
VZLA - neutral
Related Articles
Commerce Secretary Lutnick Clarifies Epstein Island Lunch Amid Scrutiny Over Relationship

Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick acknowledged having a family lunch with convicted sex offender Jef...

Paramount Enhances Hostile Proposition to Thwart Netflix-Warner Bros. Discovery Merger

Paramount Pictures has escalated its aggressive pursuit to acquire Warner Bros. Discovery by introdu...

Maximizing Your 401(k): Understanding the Power of Employer Matching

Overestimating investment returns can jeopardize retirement savings. While it's prudent to plan cons...

Why Retirement Savings Remain Stagnant and How to Address Common Pitfalls

Many individuals find themselves concerned about the insufficient growth of their retirement account...

Strategic Stress Testing of a Retirement Tax Plan with $1.8 Million in Savings at Age 58

A 58-year-old nearing retirement with $1.8 million across various accounts assessed the robustness o...

Social Security to Revamp Appointment Scheduling and Claims Processing from March 7, 2026

Starting March 7, 2026, the Social Security Administration (SSA) will implement significant operatio...