January 13, 2026
Finance

Paramount Skydance Intensifies Legal Battle Over Warner Bros.-Netflix Transaction

David Ellison Pushes for Greater Transparency and Board Reforms Amid Shareholder Dispute

Summary

Paramount Skydance Corp has escalated its conflict with Warner Bros. Discovery by filing suit to compel disclosure of financial details related to Warner Bros.' multibillion-dollar deal with Netflix. In parallel, Paramount's CEO David Ellison has initiated a proxy contest aiming to replace Warner Bros.’ board with directors amenable to negotiations. Warner Bros. has dismissed the legal challenge, maintaining the sufficiency of current disclosures and rejecting Paramount’s $30-per-share offer. The dispute centers on the valuation transparency of Warner Bros.’ assets and the comparative merits of the Netflix deal versus Paramount’s proposal.

Key Points

Paramount Skydance has initiated a lawsuit against Warner Bros. Discovery seeking disclosure of financial details regarding Warner Bros.’ Netflix acquisition deal.
Paramount CEO David Ellison is leading a proxy fight intending to replace Warner Bros.’ board with directors open to negotiating with Paramount.
Warner Bros. Discovery maintains that Paramount’s $30-per-share offer is insufficient and dismisses the lawsuit as lacking merit.
The dispute centers on Warner Bros.’ valuation of its Global Networks business, debt adjustments, and risk factors related to the Netflix transaction.

Paramount Skydance Corp (NYSE:PSKY) has markedly intensified its confrontation with Warner Bros. Discovery (NASDAQ:WBD) by launching a legal proceeding requiring disclosure of critical financial information concerning Warner Bros.’ nearly $83 billion transaction with Netflix Inc (NASDAQ:NFLX). Executed on a Monday, the lawsuit is accompanied by Paramount CEO David Ellison’s concurrent effort to initiate a proxy battle aimed at replacing the existing Warner Bros. board with directors who would entertain negotiations with Paramount's leadership.

Ellison expressed his growing dissatisfaction directly in an open letter, questioning Warner Bros.’ reluctance to engage in substantive talks: "We remain perplexed," he stated, "that WBD never attempted to clarify or negotiate any of the terms." This formality, according to Ellison, is essential to provide Warner Bros.' shareholders with the transparency necessary to make an informed decision regarding their investments.

"We filed suit this morning in Delaware Chancery Court to ask the court to simply direct WBD to provide this information so that WBD shareholders have what they need to be able to make an informed decision," Ellison explained.

This legal development follows Warner Bros. Discovery’s board reiterating, for the umpteenth time, its endorsement of the Netflix deal and advising shareholders against Paramount’s amended acquisition offer, which was introduced in late December. Paramount contends that Warner Bros.’ disclosures lack adequate detail on the valuation methodologies for elements integral to the Netflix transaction, specifically the Global Networks division and the calculation of debt reductions.

Paramount argues that without these disclosures, shareholders are deprived of the full context needed to properly evaluate the competing $30-per-share all-cash offer Paramount has tabled. Ellison elaborated on this concern in his communication, noting the omission of crucial information:

  • How the Global Networks stub equity is valued.
  • The valuation processes applied to the Netflix transaction holistically.
  • The computation and impact of purchase price adjustments related to debt within the Netflix transaction.
  • The underlying basis for Warner Bros.’ risk adjustments applied to Paramount’s offer.

In response, Warner Bros. Discovery characterized the lawsuit as "meritless," emphasizing that Paramount has not improved upon its $30-per-share bid despite multiple statements and six weeks of engagement. The company suggested that Paramount’s recourse should be to increase the offer price rather than pursue legal avenues.

"Despite six weeks and just as many press releases from Paramount Skydance, it has yet to raise the price or address the numerous and obvious deficiencies of its offer," Warner Bros. stated.

The Netflix deal encompasses a $27.75-per-share acquisition pricing for Warner Bros.’ film and television studios, HBO brands, and gaming units, subsequent to the planned spinoff of its Global Networks business during the current year. Paramount further asserts, referencing Warner Bros.’ own projections, that shares of the emerging Discovery Global entity could potentially become worthless.

Underscoring its strategic approach, Paramount intends to propose its candidates to join the Warner Bros. board ahead of the company’s 2026 shareholder meeting. The intent is to rally shareholders against the Netflix transaction’s approval.

Despite adopting confrontational legal and proxy tactics, Ellison conveyed a willingness to engage in productive conversations with Warner Bros.’ board. Nevertheless, he underscored the absence to date of any demonstration by Warner Bros. proving that the Netflix deal holds superior financial merit compared to Paramount’s cash proposal.

Market Response and Stock Performance

Following these developments, shares of Paramount Skydance Corp recorded a marginal gain of 0.16%, closing at $12.17 as of Monday outside normal trading hours, as per Benzinga Pro data. Contrastingly, Warner Bros. Discovery’s shares declined by 1.68% to $28.40 on Monday, after having appreciated over 136% in the previous six months.


The ongoing dispute between Paramount Skydance and Warner Bros. Discovery brings into sharp focus the complexities of high-stakes media acquisition deals and the significant role of shareholder transparency in corporate governance. Paramount’s aggressive legal strategy and proxy campaign reflect mounting pressure to unlock clearer financial insights that could sway shareholder sentiment and influence the final outcome of this contest for control over major entertainment assets.

Risks
  • Lack of transparency regarding Warner Bros.’ financial valuations limits shareholders’ ability to make informed decisions about competing offers.
  • Paramount’s proxy fight and lawsuit may prolong uncertainty and affect Warner Bros.’ strategic transactions and shareholder confidence.
  • Warner Bros.’ board resistance to Paramount’s offer and refusal to disclose detailed financial data may heighten legal and corporate governance risks.
  • The underlying value of Warner Bros.’ Global Networks spinoff remains unclear, contributing to valuation disputes and shareholder dissent.
Disclosure
Education only / not financial advice
Search Articles
Category
Finance

Financial News

Ticker Sentiment
PSKY - neutral WBD - neutral NFLX - neutral
Related Articles
Becton Dickinson Faces Market Headwinds Amid Transition and Revised Earnings Projections

Becton Dickinson & Co. posted first-quarter earnings above analyst expectations but trimmed its fisc...

UniFirst Shares Climb Amid Renewed Acquisition Conversations with Cintas

UniFirst Corporation's stock has experienced a significant rise following reports that it is activel...

Paramount Enhances Hostile Proposition to Thwart Netflix-Warner Bros. Discovery Merger

Paramount Pictures has escalated its aggressive pursuit to acquire Warner Bros. Discovery by introdu...

Upstart Holdings Posts Robust Q4 Earnings Growth, Shares Rise in Extended Trading

Upstart Holdings, Inc. reported fourth-quarter 2025 financial results that exceeded analyst expectat...

AstraZeneca Posts Solid Q4 Earnings, Shares Rally Near 52-Week High

AstraZeneca Plc reported fourth-quarter 2025 revenue of $15.50 billion, slightly above expectations,...

Personalis Stock Surges on New Medicare Coverage for Lung Cancer Test

Shares of Personalis, Inc. climbed sharply in premarket trading following Medicare's approval of cov...