Trump Expresses Reservations Over Using 401(k) Funds for Home Purchases Despite Affordability Concerns
January 26, 2026
Business News

Trump Expresses Reservations Over Using 401(k) Funds for Home Purchases Despite Affordability Concerns

Despite economic advisers’ push for policy changes to ease housing costs, President highlights retirement account growth as a counterpoint

Summary

President Donald Trump has openly expressed skepticism about proposals to allow individuals to tap into 401(k) retirement savings for home buying purposes. This stance contrasts with recommendations from his chief economic adviser, who highlights the challenges posed by soaring housing costs and advocates for more flexible financial options to improve affordability. Trump emphasized the strong performance of 401(k) accounts relative to the housing market as a reason for his reluctance. The president’s viewpoint emerges amid multiple administration efforts aimed at making home purchases more accessible, including interventions in mortgage-backed securities and curbing institutional real estate acquisitions.

Key Points

President Trump opposes the idea of using 401(k) retirement funds for purchasing homes, citing strong performance of these accounts.
Economic adviser Kevin Hassett recommends policies to improve housing affordability, including permitting 401(k) withdrawals for down payments.
The administration has taken steps to lower mortgage rates and restrict institutional buyers to aid first-time homebuyers.
Experts highlight that individual investors, not large corporations, are currently the main competitive buyers in the housing market.

President Donald Trump recently conveyed his lack of enthusiasm for a proposal that would permit Americans to draw from their 401(k) retirement savings to finance home purchases, a suggestion put forth by his economic team. Speaking to reporters aboard Air Force One, Trump remarked, “I’m not a huge fan. Other people like it.” This measured dissent highlights a divide within the administration regarding housing policy tools aimed at aiding prospective homeowners.

One of the primary reasons Trump cited for his opposition is the strong growth trajectory he attributes to 401(k) accounts. He stated that these retirement funds have experienced appreciable gains, often in the range of 80 to 90 percent, in some cases surpassing the performance of the housing market. However, it was not immediately clear whether the president was referring to annualized returns or cumulative growth over extended periods.

Contextual data from Fidelity Investments indicate that the average 401(k) balance rose approximately 8% year over year in the second quarter of 2025, suggesting steady but more modest appreciation than the high figures Trump mentioned. This discrepancy points to some ambiguity in the interpretation of retirement account performance metrics within the administration’s discourse.

The president’s comments arrive shortly after his chief economic adviser, Kevin Hassett, publicly highlighted the significant increase in housing costs that have burdened potential buyers. Hassett pointed out that typical monthly mortgage payments have effectively doubled, while down payment requirements have surged from roughly $15,000 to approximately $32,000. In response, Hassett outlined policy considerations aimed at alleviating affordability pressures, including the proposition to permit withdrawals from 401(k) accounts for housing down payments.

These differing perspectives occur alongside a series of strategic initiatives launched by the administration in pursuit of bolstering the housing market and expanding opportunities for homeownership. Notably, earlier in January, Trump directed the government-sponsored enterprises Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to acquire $200 billion in mortgage-backed securities. This intervention contributed to the average 30-year fixed mortgage rate falling below 6% for the first time since 2022, easing borrowing costs for buyers.

Further efforts include an executive order signed by Trump aimed at restricting Wall Street entities from purchasing single-family homes. The goal of this measure is to reduce competition from institutional investors, thereby improving access to housing for first-time buyers and young families, demographic groups often hit hardest by affordability challenges.

Despite administration optimism, some analysts question the narrative surrounding institutional buying as the primary factor limiting housing access. Jina Yoon, Chief Alternative Investment Strategist at LPL Financial, argues that individual investors, rather than corporations, constitute the dominant force in the residential real estate market competition, potentially complicating the administration’s approach.

The broader housing market context reveals a persistent mismatch between housing prices and affordability. According to analysis from Stifel, home prices would need to decline by roughly 24% to reach parity with rental affordability. Market observers suggest that such a significant price correction is unlikely, underlining the substantial barriers faced by those seeking to buy homes.

Consequently, rental markets have experienced heightened demand, with apartment Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) benefiting from the worsening cost gap between buying and renting. This trend may represent a shift in housing preferences and investment flows as affordability constraints reshape consumer behavior.

Overall, President Trump’s reservations about tapping into 401(k) funds for home purchases underscore an ongoing debate within policy circles over the most effective means of addressing housing affordability. While economic advisers advocate for leveraging retirement accounts to mitigate down payment hurdles, the president emphasizes the importance of preserving the growth potential of these retirement savings. As housing market dynamics evolve, the administration faces the challenge of balancing multiple priorities to achieve wider access to homeownership.

Risks
  • Ambiguity around the exact performance figures of 401(k) accounts may cause confusion in policy discussions.
  • Significant increases in housing costs continue to deter potential homebuyers despite administrative interventions.
  • The envisioned 24% drop in home prices to achieve affordability is considered highly improbable by analysts.
  • Restrictions on institutional buyers may not sufficiently address affordability if individual buyers remain a dominant market force.
Disclosure
Education only / not financial advice
Search Articles
Category
Business News

Business News

Ticker Sentiment
FNMA - neutral FMCC - neutral
Related Articles
Maximizing Your 401(k): Understanding the Power of Employer Matching

Overestimating investment returns can jeopardize retirement savings. While it's prudent to plan cons...

McDonald's Pairs Chicken McNuggets with Caviar in Exclusive Valentine's Day Promotion

For Valentine's Day, McDonald's is launching a unique giveaway that offers a fusion of fast food and...

Commerce Secretary Lutnick Clarifies Epstein Island Lunch Amid Scrutiny Over Relationship

Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick acknowledged having a family lunch with convicted sex offender Jef...

Why Retirement Savings Remain Stagnant and How to Address Common Pitfalls

Many individuals find themselves concerned about the insufficient growth of their retirement account...

Paramount Enhances Hostile Proposition to Thwart Netflix-Warner Bros. Discovery Merger

Paramount Pictures has escalated its aggressive pursuit to acquire Warner Bros. Discovery by introdu...

Strategic Stress Testing of a Retirement Tax Plan with $1.8 Million in Savings at Age 58

A 58-year-old nearing retirement with $1.8 million across various accounts assessed the robustness o...