January 19, 2026
Finance

Michael Burry Aligns with Ben Affleck’s Critical View on AI’s Reliability and Economic Viability

Investor Michael Burry echoes Ben Affleck's skepticism about AI technology's current capabilities and economic sustainability amid growing market enthusiasm

Loading...
Loading quote...

Summary

Investor Michael Burry has publicly supported actor Ben Affleck's recent skepticism towards artificial intelligence (AI), particularly large language models like ChatGPT. Both Burry and Affleck criticize AI's limitations in reliability, creativity, and rising operational costs, while highlighting concerns about the economic foundations of AI companies. Burry further warns of a potential AI bubble and questions the financial practices and infrastructure investments of major tech firms in the AI space.

Key Points

Michael Burry publicly supports Ben Affleck’s skeptical view of AI’s reliability and creative limitations.
Affleck argues that large language models produce average outputs and cannot replace genuine human creativity, especially in meaningful writing and filmmaking.
Affleck points out slowing AI performance improvements paired with rapidly rising operational costs, notably increased electricity and data needs.
Burry warns of an AI market bubble and criticizes major tech firms’ infrastructure investments and financial practices as potentially unsustainable or misleading.

Michael Burry, the investor renowned for predicting the 2008 financial crisis, has struck a chord with actor and filmmaker Ben Affleck by endorsing Affleck's recent critical assessment of artificial intelligence technologies. Burry's agreement with Affleck's standpoint underscores growing scrutiny over AI's practical applications and economic endurance as major players ramp up investments in this sector.

In a social media post on the platform X, Burry shared a segment from Joe Rogan's podcast featuring Ben Affleck, where the actor expressed doubts about the current efficacy of large language models such as ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini. Affleck contended that these AI models produce output that is fundamentally "not reliable." Burry complimented Affleck as an intelligent individual, emphasizing that the critique was well articulated and resonated with him deeply, even more effectively than Burry himself might have conveyed.

During the podcast discussion, Affleck elaborated that the design of these AI models is geared toward generating average responses, which impairs their ability to replace authentic human creativity. Though he conceded that AI might serve particular limited functions efficiently, he remains unconvinced that it can ever produce genuinely meaningful artistic works, casting doubt on claims that AI could generate entire films independently in the future.

Affleck also raised concerns about the economic sustainability of AI technologies. He highlighted that the progression in performance gains is decelerating, as exemplified by the transition from ChatGPT 4.0 to 5.0, which sees roughly a 25% improvement at the expense of quadrupling electricity and data consumption. This imbalance between increasing costs and diminishing returns leads Affleck to conclude that AI will primarily supplement rather than supplant human artistic endeavors. He characterized AI as a useful tool for automating burdensome or expensive tasks but asserted that core artistic elements will always depend on human input.

Echoing similar cautionary sentiments, Michael Burry has issued multiple warnings about the possibility of an impending AI bubble. He has recently expressed criticism towards prominent technology companies including Microsoft Corp. and Alphabet Inc. for their substantial infrastructure investments, which he warns may soon become outdated and economically untenable. Burry has explicitly disclosed a short position against NVIDIA Corp., labeling it the "purest play" on AI and simultaneously indicating his concern that the company is overly dependent on ongoing AI infrastructure expansion.

Beyond infrastructure concerns, Burry has questioned the accounting practices of leading AI companies, highlighting issues such as "suspicious revenue recognition" and potentially understated depreciation. He described the cyclical funding mechanisms prevalent among these firms as indicative of deceptive financial engineering rather than healthy business growth dynamics.

The Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF, which tracks the AI sector, has experienced a significant rise of 41.36% so far in 2025 and an impressive gain of 139.89% over the past five years. Despite such growth, the ETF currently trades at a price-to-earnings ratio of 30, slightly above the S&P 500 average of 28, suggesting a premium valuation. This fund rates highly on Momentum indicators, reflecting favorable short-, medium-, and long-term price trends indicative of continued investor enthusiasm.

Major AI-related stocks contain diverse investor sentiment as market participants balance high valuations with concerns about the long-term viability of current AI business models. Alphabet Inc. shares are priced around $329.85 and $329.55 for different classes, Microsoft Corporation trades near $460.70, and NVIDIA's shares are roughly $186.25, all showing relatively stable trading with minor fluctuations. Despite the upbeat market positioning, the noted skepticism by influential figures like Burry and Affleck introduces an important counterpoint to the otherwise bullish AI narrative.


In summary, the convergence of opinions from investor Michael Burry and actor Ben Affleck highlights a cautious perspective on AI's broader impact. Their shared critique focuses particularly on the technology's current limitations in creativity and reliability, the economic pressures posed by escalating infrastructure costs, and questionable financial reporting within leading AI companies. Such warnings serve as a reminder for investors and observers to remain discerning amid the rapid growth and hype surrounding AI products and services.

Risks
  • Potential AI bubble burst due to overvaluation and unsustainable investments in AI infrastructure.
  • Rising operational costs for advanced AI models may negatively affect profitability and adoption.
  • Questionable accounting and revenue recognition methods employed by leading AI companies could pose financial risks for investors.
  • The fundamental technological limitations of AI restrict its ability to replace human creativity, limiting its disruptive potential in creative industries.
Disclosure
Education only / not financial advice
Search Articles
Category
Finance

Financial News

Ticker Sentiment
CHAT - neutral GOOG - neutral GOOGL - neutral MSFT - neutral NVDA - negative
Related Articles
IBM Advances Storage Technology with AI-Integrated FlashSystem Portfolio

IBM announced the launch of its latest FlashSystem portfolio, incorporating artificial intelligence ...

Nebius Strengthens AI Platform with Tavily Acquisition

Nebius Group is advancing its artificial intelligence capabilities by acquiring Tavily, an agentic s...

Zillow Faces Stock Decline Following Quarterly Earnings That Marginally Beat Revenue Expectations

Zillow Group Inc recent quarterly results reflect steady revenue growth surpassing sector averages b...

Robinhood Reports Q4 Revenue Peak and Expands Market Contracts to 8.5 Billion

Robinhood Markets Inc. delivered a notable fourth-quarter performance with record revenue of $1.28 b...

Figma Shares Climb as Analysts Predict Software Sector Recovery

Figma Inc's stock experienced a notable uptick amid a broader rally in software equities. Analysts a...

SoFi Shares Slip Slightly Despite Strong Q4 Earnings and Bullish Outlook

SoFi Technologies Inc’s stock saw a minor decline Tuesday afternoon following a period of heighten...