December 25, 2025
Finance

Nike Faces Legal Challenge Over 'Total 90' Trademark Ahead of Soccer World Cup

Trademark Dispute Emerges After Sportswear Giant Lets Iconic 'Total 90' Mark Lapse, Introducing Uncertainty Into Marketing Plans

Loading...
Loading quote...

Summary

Nike Inc. is embroiled in a trademark conflict concerning its once-flagship soccer product line 'Total 90' after the company neglected to renew the trademark registration in 2019. The trademark was subsequently registered by Hugh Bartlett, who has since initiated legal proceedings against Nike, complicating the brand's positioning as the World Cup approaches. This ongoing litigation surfaces despite Nike's recent strong quarterly results and insider purchases, adding fresh uncertainties to the company's outlook.

Key Points

Nike failed to renew its Total 90 trademark registration in 2019, which was subsequently acquired by Hugh Bartlett in 2022.
Bartlett, an engineer and soccer coach, founded Total90 LLC and filed a trademark infringement lawsuit against Nike in November relating to the similar trademarks 'TOTAL 90' and 'TOTAL90'.
A federal judge rejected Bartlett's motion for a temporary restraint on Nike's sales under the Total 90 brand, but the broader legal dispute continues.
The preliminary injunction hearing for the trademark case is scheduled for January 8, 2026.
Nike reported strong second-quarter revenue of $12.43 billion and earnings of 53 cents per share, despite facing market pressures like tariffs and weakening demand in China.
The trademark issue introduces additional uncertainty into Nike’s marketing strategy ahead of the World Cup.
Apple CEO Tim Cook, also a Nike board member, recently purchased 50,000 Nike shares worth about $2.95 million, signaling insider confidence.
Nike's stock market cap is approximately $88.69 billion, with a 12-month decline of over 22% and a moderate valuation score from Benzinga.

Nike Inc. (NYSE: NKE), a leading figure in the global sportswear market, is currently contending with a significant legal matter that may disrupt its marketing blueprint ahead of one of soccer's most anticipated events, the World Cup. Central to this issue is the trademark for 'Total 90,' an emblematic product line of Nike's soccer equipment and apparel that has played a crucial role in its global soccer marketing strategies.

The difficulty arose because Nike failed to renew its registration for the 'Total 90' trademark in 2019, which allowed another party to acquire the rights. The trademark was officially registered in February 2022 by Hugh Bartlett, an engineer and soccer coach hailing from New Orleans. Bartlett's registration sparked a legal confrontation after he reached out to Nike for a potential collaboration but found negotiations deteriorating. Consequently, Bartlett established Total90 LLC and proceeded to file a lawsuit against Nike in November, alleging trademark infringement.

The legal contention centers on the use and registration of the marks “TOTAL 90” by Nike and “TOTAL90” by Bartlett’s company, with the dispute highlighting the nuanced differentiation of a space in the branding. While such distinctions in trademark cases can be pivotal, they often lead to complicated judicial analyses.

In earlier developments, Nike experienced a favorable outcome when a federal judge from the Eastern District of Louisiana dismissed Bartlett's motion designed to temporarily prevent Nike from selling products under its 'Total 90' label. Despite this, the broader trademark dispute persists and intensifies questions about whether Nike effectively abandoned the trademark by not renewing it.

Looking ahead, the judiciary process will continue to unfold with a key preliminary injunction hearing scheduled for January 8, 2026. Both Nike and Total90 LLC have abstained from providing comments on this ongoing litigation, leaving observers and market participants to closely monitor developments.

The timing of this legal battle arrives amidst a pivotal phase for Nike Corporation. In its latest second-quarter earnings report, the company announced revenues reaching $12.43 billion along with earnings of 53 cents per share, signaling operational resilience. However, the stock has faced downward pressure due to various geopolitical and economic headwinds, including concerns surrounding tariffs, diminished consumer demand in China, and a slower-than-anticipated recovery trajectory.

Adding to this complex scenario, the trademark dispute injects an additional layer of uncertainty regarding Nike's branding and marketing capabilities linked to its 'Total 90' soccer line. Such issues can ripple across investor sentiment and strategic planning.

Nevertheless, there are positive signals within the investor community. Notably, Apple CEO Tim Cook, who also holds a position on Nike's board, recently executed a significant insider purchase of approximately 50,000 shares valued at nearly $2.95 million. This transaction elevated Cook’s total holdings to about 105,480 shares, worth close to $6 million and has been interpreted as a vote of confidence in Nike's business prospects.

From a trading perspective, Nike commands a market capitalization of nearly $88.69 billion. The stock has experienced a 52-week trading range between $52.28 and $82.44 and has declined more than 22% over the past twelve months. Analysis from Benzinga’s Edge Stock Rankings reflects a value score of 57.34 for Nike’s shares, indicating moderate valuation metrics relative to the broader market segment.

As Nike navigates this trademark litigation combined with ongoing operational challenges, market participants and stakeholders will be keen to assess how these dynamics influence the company's competitive position and financial performance in the period leading into the World Cup and beyond.

Risks
  • Ongoing trademark litigation could disrupt Nike's marketing and sales related to the Total 90 soccer line.
  • Possible judicial rulings against Nike might impact brand usage rights leading up to the World Cup.
  • Market sentiment may be adversely affected by the legal uncertainties.
  • External pressures such as tariffs and slowing demand in China add financial strain alongside legal risks.
  • Delayed resolution of the trademark dispute extends uncertainty over strategic branding decisions.
  • The financial performance could be impacted if Nike has to alter or withdraw the Total 90 branding.
  • Competition and market challenges due to slower-than-expected turnaround pace may be exacerbated by trademark complications.
  • Inability to reach an agreement or settlement could prolong litigation and legal expenses.
Disclosure
Nike and Total90 LLC did not provide comments regarding the trademark dispute as of this report. This article is based on publicly available information and does not constitute investment advice.
Search Articles
Category
Finance

Financial News

Ticker Sentiment
Related Articles
Charles Schwab Shares Slip Amid Industry Concerns Over AI-Driven Disruption

Shares of Charles Schwab Corp experienced a significant decline following the introduction of an AI-...

Leadership Turmoil Deepens in Elon Musk's Companies Amid Wave of Executive Departures

In the early months of 2026, several key executives have stepped down from leadership roles within E...

Coca-Cola Company Delivers Steady Growth Amid Leadership Transition and Market Challenges in Q4 2025

The Coca-Cola Company reported its financial results for the fourth quarter of 2025, highlighting st...

Nektar Therapeutics Shares Surge on Strong Atopic Dermatitis Trial Data

Nektar Therapeutics' stock experienced a significant gain following the release of positive 36-week ...

Amazon's Investment Propels Beta Technologies Stock in After-Hours Trading

Beta Technologies Inc, an aerospace company specializing in electric aircraft and propulsion systems...

Zillow Faces Stock Decline Following Quarterly Earnings That Marginally Beat Revenue Expectations

Zillow Group Inc recent quarterly results reflect steady revenue growth surpassing sector averages b...