Rise in App Usage Reflects Danish Pushback Against U.S. Greenland Policy
February 8, 2026
News & Politics

Rise in App Usage Reflects Danish Pushback Against U.S. Greenland Policy

Mobile applications aiding boycott of American products see renewed interest amid diplomatic tensions

Summary

In response to heightened tensions over U.S. President Donald Trump's proposition to acquire Greenland, mobile applications designed to assist consumers in identifying and boycotting American-made goods have experienced a notable increase in user engagement. The apps utilize artificial intelligence and barcode scanning technology to enable consumers in Denmark and other countries to make informed purchasing decisions by revealing product origins and offering alternative European options. While such initiatives may not significantly impact the U.S. economy, they symbolize a political statement and aim to promote greater reliance on European suppliers.

Key Points

Mobile applications aiding the boycott of American products, such as "Made O'Meter" and "NonUSA," have seen a marked increase in user engagement in Denmark and other countries during the diplomatic tensions over Greenland.
Technological integration in these apps includes artificial intelligence for product identification and barcode scanning to provide consumers with detailed product origin information and European alternatives.
Despite the surge in app use and consumer interest, American goods constitute a small fraction of Danish grocery products, while American technology use remains widespread in Denmark, limiting the potential economic impact of these boycotts.

Mobile app developers facilitating consumer boycotts of U.S. products report a significant rise in downloads and activity in Denmark and internationally following recent diplomatic tensions concerning Greenland. Ian Rosenfeldt, a Copenhagen-based digital marketing professional, created the "Made O'Meter" app to assist shoppers wanting to avoid American brands. Since its launch in March, it has accumulated over 100,000 downloads, with approximately 30,000 occurring during a three-day span in late January amid the diplomatic dispute.

Rosenfeldt conceived the app within a Facebook community of Danes discussing practical means of avoiding U.S. merchandise. He explained that conventional barcode scanning tools offered limited insight into product nationality, complicating efforts to make conscious choices. The latest iteration of "Made O'Meter" incorporates artificial intelligence to analyze multiple products simultaneously and proposes comparable European-made alternatives. Users can customize settings to exclude "USA-owned brands" or restrict selections to "EU-based brands," with claimed accuracy exceeding 95%. During a demonstration in a Copenhagen grocery store, Rosenfeldt highlighted the AI's capacity to extract detailed product information to inform consumer decisions.

Following initial interest upon release, app engagement subsided until January when President Trump's vocal push to acquire Greenland, a geopolitically strategic and mineral-rich autonomous Danish territory, reignited interest. Daily scans surged from approximately 500 last summer to nearly 40,000 on January 23, before stabilizing at about 5,000 per day. Usage spans multiple countries including Denmark, Germany, Spain, Italy, and Venezuela.

Rosenfeldt characterized the situation as becoming deeply personal, expressing concern about "losing an ally and a friend." The U.S. president had announced potential tariffs on Denmark and other European nations opposed to U.S. plans for Greenland but retracted the threat citing a "framework" for future Arctic cooperation negotiated with NATO assistance. Subsequent technical discussions commenced involving the U.S., Denmark, and Greenland, all underscoring non-negotiable sovereignty claims. Rosenfeldt acknowledges that while the boycott's economic impact on the U.S. is limited, it aims to influence supermarkets and elevate European production reliance.

Parallel to "Made O'Meter," another Danish app named "NonUSA" exceeded 100,000 downloads by early February. Jonas Pipper, a 21-year-old co-creator, observed intense user activity around January 21 with up to 526 product scans per minute during peak periods. Of the users, 46,000 reside in Denmark, with approximately 10,000 in Germany. Pipper noted that the app empowers users, alleviating some sense of helplessness in geopolitical tensions.

However, experts question the practical effects of such digital boycotts. Christina Gravert, associate economics professor at the University of Copenhagen, points out that U.S. products account for a minimal share of Danish grocery shelves, approximately 1-3%, primarily nuts, wines, and confectionery. Danish consumption of American technology—Apple devices, Microsoft applications—is considerable. Gravert emphasizes that meaningful impact likely resides in technology sectors rather than groceries. She also notes that apps themselves rely on American-operated platforms such as Apple's App Store and Google Play Store.

Behavioral economics research suggests boycott movements have limited duration and that substantive change requires coordinated initiatives beyond individual consumers. Large retail chains responding to consumer sentiment by modifying their product offerings could exert influence on import patterns. Anecdotal evidence from Copenhagen shoppers reveals divided perspectives, with some engaging in selective boycotts based on brand recognition and others resisting such measures due to positive personal associations with the United States.

Risks
  • The boycott apps' reliance on American software platforms like Apple's App Store and Google Play Store underscores vulnerability to disruptions, potentially limiting their reach or effectiveness, particularly in the technology sector.
  • The short-lived nature of consumer boycott movements as indicated by behavioral economics experts may result in transient impact, reducing long-term influence on U.S. goods and European suppliers.
  • The limited presence of U.S. products in Danish retail may constrain the broader relevance and economic effect of consumer boycotts in the grocery sector, suggesting impacts may be more symbolic than substantive.
Disclosure
This article is based solely on information obtained from involved parties and experts described, with no additional speculation or unverified data added.
Search Articles
Category
News & Politics

News & Politics

Related Articles
Figma Shares Climb as Analysts Predict Software Sector Recovery

Figma Inc's stock experienced a notable uptick amid a broader rally in software equities. Analysts a...

Zillow Faces Stock Decline Following Quarterly Earnings That Marginally Beat Revenue Expectations

Zillow Group Inc recent quarterly results reflect steady revenue growth surpassing sector averages b...

Robinhood Reports Q4 Revenue Peak and Expands Market Contracts to 8.5 Billion

Robinhood Markets Inc. delivered a notable fourth-quarter performance with record revenue of $1.28 b...

Adobe: Leaning Long After a Near-Term Capitulation - A Tactical Bounce Trade

Adobe (ADBE) has pulled back to roughly $265 (02/10/2026), levels not seen in over a year despite st...

Oracle Shares Strengthen Amid Renewed Confidence in AI Sector Recovery

Oracle Corporation's stock showed notable gains as the software industry experiences a rebound, fuel...

SoFi Shares Slip Slightly Despite Strong Q4 Earnings and Bullish Outlook

SoFi Technologies Inc’s stock saw a minor decline Tuesday afternoon following a period of heighten...