S&P 500 Valuation Signals Potential Decline Amid Impact of Tariffs on U.S. Economy
February 7, 2026
Finance

S&P 500 Valuation Signals Potential Decline Amid Impact of Tariffs on U.S. Economy

Economic studies reveal tariffs disproportionately affect American consumers and firms, coinciding with historic overvaluation signals in stock markets.

Summary

The S&P 500 index has shown little growth in early 2026, with valuations reaching levels reminiscent of the dot-com crisis. Concurrently, multiple analyses indicate that tariffs implemented under President Trump are costing U.S. consumers and companies more than previously claimed, potentially undermining economic growth. Investors face a complex market scenario with increased valuations and tariff-induced economic headwinds.

Key Points

Multiple authoritative studies indicate that U.S. consumers and firms absorb the majority of costs from President Trump's tariffs, contradicting claims that foreign exporters pay most tariffs.
The S&P 500's cyclically adjusted price-to-earnings (CAPE) ratio has remained above 39 for four consecutive months in early 2026, a valuation level last seen during the dot-com crash, historically associated with poor subsequent market returns.
Tariffs act as a consumption tax, reducing disposable incomes and increasing businesses' input costs, potentially slowing economic growth since consumer spending and business investment constitute about 85% of GDP.

Throughout the opening months of 2026, the S&P 500 has largely remained stagnant, reflecting a market in balance yet signaling underlying vulnerabilities. Historical data suggests that such a pattern, particularly when paired with specific valuation indicators, could precede substantial declines over coming periods.

Central to these concerns are studies examining the financial impact of tariffs introduced under President Trump's administration. Contrary to assertions made by the President that foreign entities bear the majority of these costs, extensive research shows a significant burden is actually absorbed by United States companies and consumers.

President Trump previously asserted that foreign exporters paid approximately 80% of tariff expenses, highlighting a Harvard Business School study as evidence. However, a closer examination of the research reveals an opposite conclusion: U.S. consumers themselves may bear up to 43% of the tariff costs, with the remaining share absorbed by American firms. This directly challenges the narrative of foreign payment dominance.

Supporting this, economic analysis by Goldman Sachs demonstrated that as of October 2025, U.S. companies and consumers together accounted for 84% of tariff payments. Projections indicate that by July 2026, consumers alone could shoulder around 67% of the expenses stemming from tariffs.

Further validating this trend, research conducted by the Kiel Institute assessed global shipments totaling approximately $4 trillion over nearly two years, concluding that foreign exporters absorbed only about 4% of the tariff costs. The overwhelming majority, 96%, was passed through to American importers and consumers.

This redistribution effectively functions as a consumption tax, reducing purchasing power among consumers and elevating input expenses for businesses. Since consumer spending and business investment combine to constitute approximately 85% of gross domestic product (GDP), the diversion of financial resources caused by tariffs poses a credible risk to economic expansion.

Simultaneously, the S&P 500's valuation metrics present an additional cautionary signal. The cyclically adjusted price-to-earnings ratio (CAPE), a measure widely used to assess market overvaluation, registered an average of 39.9 in January 2026. This marked the fourth consecutive month with a CAPE above 39, a threshold last observed during the infamous dot-com bubble burst in October 2000.

Historically, CAPE ratios exceeding 39 have correlated with disappointing future returns for the stock market. Data from renowned economist Robert Shiller reveal that following such elevated CAPE readings, the S&P 500 experiences an average return of 0% over six months, a decrease of 4% over one year, and a substantial 20% decline on average over two years.

Time Period Best Return Worst Return Average Return
6 months 16% (20%) 0%
1 year 16% (28%) (4%)
2 years 8% (43%) (20%)

These valuation concerns compound the economic risks posed by tariffs, suggesting a possible confluence of market overvaluation and economic growth deceleration. Such a scenario may heighten the probability of significant market corrections.

However, investors should consider that past performance does not guarantee future results. While current valuations are high, drivers such as advancements in artificial intelligence could stimulate enhanced earnings growth for companies listed on the S&P 500. Indeed, corporate earnings accelerated in 2025, with forecasts anticipating continued growth acceleration into 2026.

Given this intricacy, wholesale portfolio liquidation in expectation of market downturns may not be advisable. Instead, investors might benefit from reassessing their holdings, divesting assets in which confidence is limited, and approaching new investments with prudence. Accumulating cash positions can provide flexibility and mitigate exposure during periods of increased market uncertainty.

Ultimately, focusing on long-term wealth accumulation rather than short-term volatility remains a fundamental strategy. Over the past three decades, the S&P 500 has yielded an average annual return of 10.2%, a trend investors may reasonably hope continues in the future despite current challenges.

Risks
  • Elevated S&P 500 valuations suggest the market is vulnerable to significant corrections over the next one to two years, based on historical return patterns following high CAPE readings.
  • Tariffs could materially diminish economic growth by siphoning funds away from consumers and businesses, negatively impacting corporate profitability and market performance.
  • Investors face uncertainty regarding whether earnings growth acceleration, potentially driven by artificial intelligence advancements, will be sufficient to offset tariff-related economic headwinds and market overvaluation.
Disclosure
This analysis is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. Investors should consider their circumstances and consult with financial professionals before making investment decisions.
Search Articles
Category
Finance

Financial News

Ticker Sentiment
GSPC - neutral
Related Articles
Robinhood Reports Q4 Revenue Peak and Expands Market Contracts to 8.5 Billion

Robinhood Markets Inc. delivered a notable fourth-quarter performance with record revenue of $1.28 b...

UBS Adjusts Tech Sector Outlook, Advocates Diversification Into Healthcare and Financials

UBS has revised its stance on the U.S. information technology sector from attractive to neutral, hig...

Eddie Bauer Seeks Chapter 11 Protection Amid Rising Tariff and Inflation Challenges

Eddie Bauer LLC has filed for voluntary Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in the District of New Jers...

Analysts Adjust Forecasts After Pagaya Technologies’ Q4 Earnings and Lowered Guidance

Pagaya Technologies Ltd. released its fourth-quarter financial results showing earnings per share su...

Dow Advances More Than 200 Points as Coca-Cola Reports Varied Q4 Performance

U.S. equity markets experienced a mixed session with the Dow Jones Industrial Average rising over 20...

Jumia Technologies Shares Decline Following Q4 Financial Results

Jumia Technologies AG experienced a notable decrease in its share price after announcing fourth-quar...