Amid Minneapolis Tensions, Calls Grow for Federal Immigration Officers to Withdraw
January 25, 2026
News & Politics

Amid Minneapolis Tensions, Calls Grow for Federal Immigration Officers to Withdraw

Controversial shooting by Border Patrol ignites protests and legal conflict in Minnesota

Summary

The fatal shooting of Alex Pretti, a 37-year-old ICU nurse, by a Border Patrol agent in Minneapolis has intensified calls from local officials and Democratic leaders nationwide for federal immigration agents to leave Minnesota. Conflicting accounts and bystander video footage have fueled protests in a city still reeling from an earlier federal officer-involved death in January, prompting legal battles over investigation control and evidence preservation. The incident has spurred national debate on immigration enforcement tactics, gun rights at protests, and federal-state relations in law enforcement.

Key Points

The fatal shooting of Alex Pretti by a Border Patrol agent in Minneapolis has intensified local and national demands for the removal of federal immigration officers from Minnesota.
Bystander video footage challenges official accounts from the Trump administration about the shooting dynamics, particularly whether Pretti posed a threat when he was shot.
Legal action by Minnesota officials aims to preserve evidence and ensure a transparent investigation, reflecting tensions over federal versus state control in law enforcement investigations.

Minneapolis again found itself at the center of national debate following the fatal shooting of Alex Pretti, a 37-year-old intensive care nurse, by a U.S. Border Patrol agent. The incident, which occurred on a commercial street in south Minneapolis, provoked immediate calls by local leaders and Democrats across the country for the withdrawal of federal immigration officers from the state.

Pretti was shot early on a Saturday morning amidst a tense confrontation with immigration agents who had recently increased their presence in Minneapolis amid a surge in immigration enforcement. Bystander videos reviewed show Pretti seemingly unarmed, holding only his cell phone as he stepped between an immigration agent and a woman who was pushed to the ground by officers. These videos appear to contradict assertions made by the Trump administration officials, who characterized the agents' gunfire as defensive actions following an alleged attack by Pretti.

During the altercation, agents discovered a 9 mm semiautomatic handgun on Pretti, who reportedly possessed a valid concealed carry permit. Video footage depicts officers disarming him before shots were fired multiple times. However, no visible evidence from the videos reviewed indicates that Pretti brandished the weapon or posed a clear threat to any officers at the time of shooting.

Authorities including Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem and U.S. Border Patrol Commander Gregory Bovino publicly framed Pretti as the aggressor, with claims that he assaulted officers and had intentions to "massacre law enforcement." Further intensifying the rhetoric, White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller labeled Pretti a "would-be assassin" on social media platform X.

Pretti’s family has challenged the official narrative, expressing deep sorrow and anger toward federal officials. They condemned what they called "sickening lies" spread about their son, emphasizing that he was holding only a phone with an empty hand raised in a protective gesture, while also noting that agents had pushed a woman to the ground and deployed pepper spray during the incident.

Adding to the complexities of the case, a federal judge has issued an order preventing the destruction or alteration of evidence related to the shooting. This order followed legal action by Minnesota state and Hennepin County authorities seeking access to materials collected by federal officers, which state investigators have reportedly not been permitted to review.

Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison emphasized the necessity of a comprehensive, impartial, and transparent inquiry, criticizing obstruction by federal personnel who, despite having a judicial warrant, initially barred the state's Bureau of Criminal Apprehension officers from the scene. Federal agencies named in the lawsuit have not responded to requests for comment.

The Minnesota National Guard temporarily assisted local law enforcement at Governor Tim Walz’s request, deploying troops to both the shooting location and a federal building where confrontations have arisen amid the ongoing immigration enforcement actions. Minneapolis Police Chief Brian O’Hara later noted a reduction in federal involvement, stating that routine responses had reverted primarily to the local police department, which is contending with significant operational burdens from the combined pressures of immigration enforcement clashes and maintaining regular city policing duties.

The circumstances surrounding Pretti's carrying of a firearm have drawn statements from gun rights groups, underscoring the legality of bearing arms during protests and public gatherings, provided statutory requirements such as permits are met. The Minnesota Gun Owners Caucus highlighted citizens' rights to bear arms while lawfully engaging in protests or exercising their First Amendment protections.

National political figures have also weighed in. Former President Barack Obama described Pretti’s death as a heartbreaking tragedy and urged cooperation among federal, state, and city officials to prevent further upheaval while pursuing legitimate law enforcement objectives. Conversely, then-President Donald Trump criticized Minnesota’s governor and mayor, accusing them of fomenting insurrection and questioning local police involvement, while publicizing images of the handgun recovered by immigration officials.

Democrats, including Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer, have called for a halt to funding for Immigration and Customs Enforcement, linking the shooting to broader concerns about federal immigration enforcement's impact on local communities and civil liberties. These political stances raise the possibility of significant implications for federal budgeting and government operations if funds are withheld.

The shooting took place less than two miles from where another fatal encounter involving a federal immigration officer occurred earlier in January, leading to widespread protests in the region. Following Pretti's shooting, protests erupted in multiple cities, including New York, Washington, and Los Angeles, with Minneapolis seeing an influx of demonstrators braving severe cold to demand the departure of federal immigration agents.

Footage of the initial confrontation shows officers pepper spraying Pretti and another woman after an agent shoved her to the street. Pretti is seen attempting to intervene, holding his phone toward the officers, with no discernible weapon display. The situation escalated quickly with officers pinning Pretti to the ground, using force that included striking him near the head with a canister before gunfire ensued. The source of the first gunshot remains unclear, though officers began to fire several shots in rapid succession, ultimately resulting in Pretti's death.

Bovino defended the officers' actions in public statements, asserting that Pretti disregarded police commands and injected himself into a dangerous situation with fatal outcomes. However, these assertions are disputed by witness video and statements from local officials and Pretti's family.

In the immediate aftermath, demonstrators voiced their outrage by calling federal agents "cowards" and erecting barricades with set fires, although quiet vigils honoring Pretti were also held near the shooting site. Community members have expressed solidarity with Pretti and concern over the ongoing federal law enforcement presence, emphasizing the growing tensions between local populations and immigration authorities.

Risks
  • Ongoing conflicts between federal immigration enforcement and local communities may lead to sustained civil unrest, impacting public safety and local economies, especially in urban areas.
  • Legal uncertainty and political disputes over agency jurisdiction could delay transparent investigations, potentially undermining public trust in law enforcement institutions.
  • Political polarization surrounding immigration enforcement funding could result in government budget impasses, affecting federal agencies including those responsible for homeland security and immigration control.
Disclosure
This article is based solely on the information provided without any additions or external analysis beyond the presented facts.
Search Articles
Category
News & Politics

News & Politics

Related Articles
FDA Initiates Review of BHA Food Additive Safety

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has announced plans to conduct a comprehensive reassessm...

Partisan Divide Deepens as White House Excludes Democratic Governors from NGA Meeting

The longstanding bipartisan forum of the National Governors Association (NGA) is facing disruption a...

Using Fireplace Ashes in Your Garden: Benefits and Considerations

Amidst a notably cold winter leading to increased fireplace use, many homeowners are seeking sustain...