Global Leaders Respond Firmly to U.S. Greenland Policy at Davos Forum
January 20, 2026
News & Politics

Global Leaders Respond Firmly to U.S. Greenland Policy at Davos Forum

Davos forum witnesses sharp criticism as U.S. pursuit of Greenland raises alarm among allies and global powers

Summary

At the World Economic Forum in Davos, prominent international figures voiced strong opposition to U.S. President Trump's continued efforts to acquire Greenland, alongside the threat of new tariffs tied to the issue. European leaders condemned the aggressive stance as a dangerous return to colonialist policies, while North American officials highlighted the need for unified multilateral engagement. Sharp rhetoric and warnings underscored the tension surrounding global trade relations and territorial sovereignty tensions.

Key Points

European leaders at Davos strongly oppose U.S. President Trump's efforts to acquire Greenland and related tariff threats, viewing them as a revival of colonial-era tactics that undermine international cooperation.
Middle-tier global powers emphasize the necessity of collective multilateral engagement to navigate the dynamics of great power rivalries, reinforcing support for Greenland and Denmark's sovereignty.
U.S. officials simultaneously seek to temper perceptions of discord with Europe, affirming strong alliances despite disagreements over Greenland, highlighting ongoing collaboration on other global issues such as the Russia-Ukraine conflict.

In Davos, Switzerland, a gathering of world leaders at the annual World Economic Forum was marked by serious admonitions and unfiltered language in response to U.S. President Donald Trump's persistent campaign to purchase Greenland and introduce associated tariffs.

French President Emmanuel Macron, visibly affected by an eye infection and wearing aviator sunglasses, issued a stern warning against what he described as a "new colonial approach" jeopardizing decades of international cooperation.

Canadian Prime Minister and former central banker Mark Carney emphasized the importance of mid-tier nations banding together to sustain multilateralism, opposing attempts by dominant powers to act unilaterally. He described the necessity for a "dense web of connections" to navigate great power rivalries effectively.

California Governor Gavin Newsom openly expressed frustration during interactions with European delegates, bluntly urging them to abandon complicity and demonstrate resolve. Newsom criticized the world leaders' perceived failure to push back against aggressive diplomacy, likening dealings with President Trump to negotiations with a predatory "T-Rex," imploring leaders to adopt fortitude and sincerity in their international conduct.

He stated emphatically, "I can’t take this complicity. People rolling over. I should’ve brought a bunch of knee pads for all the world leaders. I hope people understand how pathetic they look on the world stage. From an American perspective, it’s embarrassing." He condemned diplomatic niceties as insufficient and demanded stronger responses.

During his address, President Macron began with a sardonic remark on the current era's supposed "peace, stability and predictability" before condemning the resurgence of imperial ambitions. He decried a global trend toward a lawless environment where might supersedes international law. He specifically criticized U.S. trade policies aimed at undermining European exports, imposing tariffs, and challenging territorial sovereignty, framing such maneuvers as fundamentally unacceptable.

Mark Carney articulated that while great powers have the capacity to act independently due to their market size and military strength, middle powers must collaborate to survive and influence global affairs. Reiterating Canada's support for Greenland and Denmark's sovereign right over Greenland's future, Carney firmly opposed U.S. territorial expansion ambitions in the Arctic.

Meanwhile, U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, ahead of President Trump's scheduled forum address, sought to downplay tensions, stating relations between the U.S. and Europe have never been closer and advising calm amidst what he described as hysterical reactions. He reaffirmed the undisputed NATO partnership and collective efforts to address the conflict between Russia and Ukraine, acknowledging the possibility of disagreements on Greenland.

Belgian Prime Minister Bart De Wever criticized the repeated violations of European "red lines" by Washington’s Greenland provocations. He warned that yielding now would lead to a loss of dignity and signal the decline of decades-long Atlantic cooperation. De Wever, citing philosopher Antonio Gramsci, underscored that the future of the transatlantic alliance hinges on President Trump's decisions, portraying him as a figure capable of either preserving or destroying these bonds.

European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen cautioned against the dangers of an escalating diplomatic downturn that could only benefit geopolitical adversaries. She condemned the proposed new tariffs as a misstep between established allies and underscored the binding nature of existing trade agreements between the EU and the U.S. Von der Leyen emphasized Europe’s responsibility to respond to changing international pressures by evolving into a stronger, more autonomous union, noting the special friendship shared with the American people and warning against actions that would harm collective strategic interests.

The forum's debates underscored the complexities of balancing national ambitions with global partnerships, as key figures called for renewed commitment to diplomatic integrity, multilateral collaboration, and respect for sovereignty amidst rising tensions over Greenland's status.

Risks
  • Escalating U.S.-Europe tensions stemming from tariffs and territorial claims could destabilize longstanding alliances, impacting international trade and geopolitical stability.
  • Renewed assertions of territorial control in the Arctic may provoke diplomatic conflicts and contribute to a fracturing of global multilateral institutions, with potential repercussions for security and economic cooperation.
  • Failure to effectively manage this diplomatic crisis risks undermining transatlantic partnerships critical to addressing broader issues such as economic policies and geopolitical conflicts, potentially affecting markets sensitive to political risk.
Disclosure
This article is based on reported statements and events as of the date provided. No speculative analysis beyond presented facts has been made. The content reflects the positions and rhetoric of various international officials at the forum without endorsement or additional commentary.
Search Articles
Category
News & Politics

News & Politics

Related Articles
Cryptocurrency Market Holds Steady Amid Anticipation of US-Iran Developments

The cryptocurrency market demonstrates a cautious stance as Bitcoin approaches the $69,000 mark. Oth...

Eddie Bauer Seeks Chapter 11 Protection Amid Rising Tariff and Inflation Challenges

Eddie Bauer LLC has filed for voluntary Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in the District of New Jers...

FDA Initiates Review of BHA Food Additive Safety

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has announced plans to conduct a comprehensive reassessm...

Partisan Divide Deepens as White House Excludes Democratic Governors from NGA Meeting

The longstanding bipartisan forum of the National Governors Association (NGA) is facing disruption a...

Using Fireplace Ashes in Your Garden: Benefits and Considerations

Amidst a notably cold winter leading to increased fireplace use, many homeowners are seeking sustain...