Hilton Issues Apology Following Cancellation of Federal Immigration Agents' Reservations
January 5, 2026
News & Politics

Hilton Issues Apology Following Cancellation of Federal Immigration Agents' Reservations

Hotel Operator and Hilton Corporate Respond After DHS Accuses Refusal to Accommodate Agents

Summary

A Minnesota hotel under the Hilton brand faced backlash after cancelling room reservations for federal immigration agents, prompting an apology from both the franchise operators and Hilton corporate. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) accused Hilton of a deliberate refusal to serve law enforcement, but subsequent statements clarified the actions conflicted with established hotel policies, with operator Everpeak Hospitality acknowledging and addressing the issue.

Key Points

The Hilton-branded Hampton Inn in Lakeville, Minnesota, cancelled room reservations for federal immigration agents, drawing criticism and a formal apology.
Department of Homeland Security accused Hilton of a coordinated refusal to serve immigration enforcement personnel, releasing evidence in the form of email screenshots.
Hilton corporate clarified the hotel is independently operated, and confirmed the hotel's actions conflicted with their policies; the local operator, Everpeak Hospitality, also apologized and committed to non-discrimination.

Hilton-brand hospitality has come under scrutiny after a Minnesota hotel declined to accommodate federal immigration enforcement agents earlier this month, leading to a formal apology from both the local hotel operators and Hilton corporate representatives. The incident unfolded at the Hampton Inn in Lakeville, located approximately 20 miles south of Minneapolis, where officials from the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) reported cancellations of room reservations made by immigration agents.

The DHS publicly shared screenshots from a Hilton email dated Friday indicating that agents engaged in immigration enforcement were prohibited from staying at the property, with their bookings cancelled. Along with the shared images, DHS accused the Hilton hotel chain of a coordinated effort to undermine law enforcement activities by denying lodging to its employees.

While Hampton Inn properties operate under the Hilton umbrella, they are predominantly managed by independent franchisees. A Hilton representative clarified that the Lakeville location is independently operated and does not function directly under corporate control. Following the controversy, Hilton released a statement affirming direct communication with the hotel, which apologized for its team’s actions that diverged from official policies.

"We have been in direct contact with the hotel, and they have apologized for the actions of their team, which was not in keeping with their policies," the Hilton statement said, emphasizing that the refusal did not reflect standard operational protocols.

The management company operating the Hampton Inn Lakeville, Everpeak Hospitality, also responded to the allegations. In their statement, they acknowledged the cancellation was inconsistent with their hospitality principles and policies, describing themselves as a welcoming establishment for all guests. Everpeak confirmed they promptly engaged with the individuals who were denied accommodation to resolve the situation and reaffirmed their commitment to non-discrimination.

"Everpeak Hospitality has moved swiftly to address this matter as it was inconsistent with our policy of being a welcoming place for all," their statement noted. "We are in touch with the impacted guests to ensure they are accommodated. We do not discriminate against any individuals or agencies and apologize to those impacted."

The event highlights complexities faced by hospitality providers affiliated with global brands but operated locally under franchise agreements, especially when addressing sensitive law enforcement engagements. The agents involved were on official assignments concerning immigration enforcement, and the interruption of their lodging arrangements drew attention from federal authorities.

This episode underscores the necessity for clear and consistent communication between franchisors, franchisees, and law enforcement entities to avoid operational mishaps that could impact enforcement activities and public perceptions.

Risks
  • Potential reputational damage to franchise hotel brands when individual properties’ actions contradict corporate policies, impacting customer trust and brand integrity, particularly in the hospitality sector.
  • Franchise operational misalignments with corporate guidelines may lead to operational risk, complicating law enforcement cooperation and guest relations.
  • Incidents of refusal of service to law enforcement agents may prompt increased scrutiny or regulatory risks for franchise operators, affecting their licenses and future contracts.
Disclosure
This analysis is based solely on the information provided in the incident reports and statements from involved parties without external sources or assumptions.
Search Articles
Category
News & Politics

News & Politics

Related Articles
FDA Initiates Review of BHA Food Additive Safety

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has announced plans to conduct a comprehensive reassessm...

Partisan Divide Deepens as White House Excludes Democratic Governors from NGA Meeting

The longstanding bipartisan forum of the National Governors Association (NGA) is facing disruption a...

Using Fireplace Ashes in Your Garden: Benefits and Considerations

Amidst a notably cold winter leading to increased fireplace use, many homeowners are seeking sustain...