Massive Protests and Clergy Arrests Mark Minnesota's Response to Intensified Immigration Enforcement
January 23, 2026
News & Politics

Massive Protests and Clergy Arrests Mark Minnesota's Response to Intensified Immigration Enforcement

Thousands Rally in Freezing Temperatures as Local Communities and Leaders Challenge Federal Immigration Actions

Summary

In Minnesota, a significant protest movement has emerged against federal immigration enforcement actions, marked notably by the arrest of approximately 100 clergy at Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport. Despite harsh winter conditions, thousands rallied downtown to oppose the Trump administration's expanded immigration crackdown, backed by a coalition of labor unions, progressive groups, and faith organizations advocating for widespread civic non-participation. The protests follow increased tensions after a fatal incident involving Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and ongoing enforcement operations that have attracted national attention, including contentious detentions of young children amid legal challenges.

Key Points

Approximately 100 clergy members were arrested at Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport for demonstrating against immigration deportation flights, marking a significant direct action involving faith leaders in the immigration debate.
Thousands of protesters gathered in downtown Minneapolis despite subzero temperatures, supported by labor, progressive groups, and over 700 businesses that shut down statewide in solidarity with the movement against intensified federal immigration enforcement.
The protests intensified following the controversial fatal shooting of Renee Good by an ICE officer, leading to ongoing public scrutiny of immigration enforcement operations and a resignation of an FBI supervisory agent due to dissatisfaction with investigation procedures.

On a frigid Friday in Minnesota, with temperatures plunging to minus 9 degrees Fahrenheit (minus 23 Celsius), thousands of demonstrators assembled in downtown Minneapolis to protest the intensified immigration enforcement directed by the federal government. This surge of activism amid severe cold is part of a growing state-wide resistance against President Donald Trump's aggressive immigration policies. Participants include a broad coalition of labor unions, progressive groups, and clergy members who are encouraging Minnesotans to disengage from work, educational activities, and commercial patronage as acts of solidarity.

A pivotal moment of the day occurred at Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport, the state's major air travel hub, where about 100 clergy were detained by police. These religious leaders were protesting deportation flights and urging airlines to halt participation in what the Department of Homeland Security has characterized as its largest immigration enforcement sweep ever. The Metropolitan Airports Commission spokesman, Jeff Lea, explained that the clergy were issued misdemeanor trespassing citations and cited for failing to comply with peace officer instructions. Their demonstration reportedly exceeded permitted boundaries near the main terminal and disrupted airline operations, prompting their arrest and subsequent release.

Reverend Mariah Furness Tollgaard from Hamline Church in St. Paul detailed her experience, noting that despite police orders to disperse, she and her fellow demonstrators chose to remain, accepting arrest to closely support migrants, including some from her congregation fearful of leaving their homes. Tollgaard indicated plans to return to her church to conduct a prayer vigil, framing the federal presence in Minnesota as an occupation that the community cannot tolerate.

Also present was Reverend Elizabeth Barish Browne from Cheyenne, Wyoming, who traveled to join the Minneapolis rally despite the harsh temperatures. Speaking from the protest, she condemned the current immigration enforcement as "clearly immoral." The protest movement in the Twin Cities has been ongoing, with daily gatherings since early January, triggered by the fatal shooting of Renee Good, a 37-year-old mother of three, by an ICE officer. This incident, alongside frequent confrontations between federal agents and community members who monitor their movements, has galvanized public outrage.

Among the protesters was Sam Nelson, a local who skipped work to support the demonstration. A former student at a Minneapolis high school where federal agents recently detained someone post-class, Nelson expressed his objection to ICE's presence on local streets, emphasizing communal solidarity against such enforcement tactics.

The protest movement has seen widespread participation beyond individual demonstrators. According to organizers, more than 700 businesses across Minnesota closed in solidarity, ranging from a bookstore in Grand Marais near the Canadian border to the Guthrie Theater in downtown Minneapolis. Kate Havelin, of Indivisible Twin Cities, one of over 100 groups involved, hailed the scale of these coordinated actions as historic.

Adding complexity to the unfolding events, an FBI supervisory agent in Minnesota resigned over dissatisfaction with the Department of Justice's handling of the investigation into Renee Good's shooting. This resignation stemmed from perceived pressure to curtail the inquiry from standard investigatory practice, although the FBI has declined to comment. Meanwhile, the Hennepin County Medical Examiner released Good's initial autopsy report affirming her death as a homicide from multiple gunshot wounds. An independent autopsy commissioned by her family corroborated these findings, detailing the trajectory of bullets through her head and noting additional wounds to her arm and breast.

Legal challenges and controversies continue surrounding recent immigration enforcement actions involving young children. A 2-year-old child was reunited with her mother after being detained with her father outside their South Minneapolis residence. The family is engaged in an ongoing asylum process, and their detention was rapidly contested in federal court. Despite a judge's order restricting out-of-state transfer of the toddler, she and her father were briefly flown to Texas but returned the following day. The Department of Homeland Security characterized the father's arrest as part of a targeted enforcement operation and claimed the child's mother initially refused to take custody, a point contested by the family's attorney.

Similarly, a 5-year-old child, Liam Ramos, was detained following his father's arrest in Columbia Heights. DHS stated the father fled the scene, resulting in Liam’s detention, despite efforts to place the child with his mother who purportedly declined custody. The child and his father are currently held together at a family detention center in Texas. Legal representatives argue that fears related to potential parental detention influenced the mother's response. Columbia Heights school officials described the child's involvement as manipulative in the enforcement context, and no criminal history for the father has been found in state records. Border Patrol officials have drawn attention away from the child's situation by highlighting broader concerns over undocumented immigrants involved in violent crimes.

These events reflect a highly charged atmosphere surrounding immigration enforcement in Minnesota, with significant community resistance, notable clergy involvement, and scrutiny of law enforcement actions in both local and federal arenas. The unfolding social dynamics are deeply intertwined with legal challenges, civil rights considerations, and public discourse on government policies impacts on immigrant families.

Risks
  • Increased federal immigration enforcement activity continues to provoke public dissent and potential operational disruptions, which could impact airport logistics, local economies, and public services sectors in Minnesota.
  • Legal contention over immigration detentions, especially involving children, presents risks of judicial intervention, reputational damage, and policy reconsiderations that may alter enforcement approaches and associated costs in government and legal sectors.
  • The polarized environment, including actions by federal agencies and community response, raises potential for confrontations or civil unrest, possibly affecting public safety, law enforcement resource allocation, and community relations.
Disclosure
The information provided in this article is based exclusively on publicly available reports and statements from officials and participants involved in the events. The article refrains from speculation beyond documented occurrences and official communications.
Search Articles
Category
News & Politics

News & Politics

Related Articles
FDA Initiates Review of BHA Food Additive Safety

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has announced plans to conduct a comprehensive reassessm...

Partisan Divide Deepens as White House Excludes Democratic Governors from NGA Meeting

The longstanding bipartisan forum of the National Governors Association (NGA) is facing disruption a...

Using Fireplace Ashes in Your Garden: Benefits and Considerations

Amidst a notably cold winter leading to increased fireplace use, many homeowners are seeking sustain...