UK Leaders Condemn Trump’s Comments on NATO’s Role in Afghanistan
January 23, 2026
News & Politics

UK Leaders Condemn Trump’s Comments on NATO’s Role in Afghanistan

British officials and military figures express outrage over U.S. president's claims diminishing non-American NATO forces’ combat contributions

Summary

British Prime Minister Keir Starmer and other UK figures have strongly criticized President Donald Trump for his statements suggesting that NATO troops from countries other than the U.S. avoided front-line combat during the Afghanistan conflict. These remarks have generated significant distress and backlash across the UK, where many remember the sacrifices made by soldiers in the international coalition formed after the 9/11 attacks.

Key Points

British leadership strongly condemns President Trump's characterization of NATO allies' roles in Afghanistan as inaccurate and disrespectful.
The United Kingdom and other NATO countries played significant, frontline roles in Afghanistan post-9/11, with considerable sacrifices including over 450 British soldiers killed.
President Trump's remarks have intensified existing tensions in trans-Atlantic relations amid disputes over Greenland and tariffs, highlighting ongoing challenges within NATO cooperation.

British Prime Minister Keir Starmer has publicly demanded an apology from U.S. President Donald Trump following the latter's remarks minimizing the involvement of non-American NATO troops on the front lines during the Afghanistan war. Starmer described the comments as "insulting" and "appalling," reflecting the deep upset caused across the United Kingdom on Friday regardless of political affiliations.

In an interview conducted in Davos, Switzerland, with Fox Business Network, President Trump questioned the reliability and contributions of NATO allies, stating, "We've never needed them, we have never really asked anything of them." He added, "You know, they'll say they sent some troops to Afghanistan, or this or that, and they did, they stayed a little back, a little off the front lines." These statements directly contradict the historical record of NATO's active role in the Afghanistan conflict.

Following the September 11 attacks in 2001, the United States led a multinational coalition to dismantle al-Qaida, and its Taliban hosts in Afghanistan. This coalition included troops from a range of countries, particularly NATO members. Notably, Article 5 of NATO's treaty—the alliance's mutual-defense obligation—was invoked for the first time after these attacks, underlining the commitment to mutual assistance among member states.

The United Kingdom, as a significant NATO member, suffered considerable losses and made substantial contributions throughout the conflict. Prime Minister Starmer honored the 457 British service members who died and acknowledged those with enduring injuries from the war, stating, "I will never forget their courage, their bravery and the sacrifice they made for their country." He further condemned President Trump's remarks, noting that they have caused pain not only to the families of the fallen and injured but also to the nation as a whole.

Prince Harry, who served two tours in Afghanistan with the British Army and lost comrades during the conflict, also voiced his disapproval indirectly. Without naming the president, he emphasized, "The sacrifices of British soldiers during the war deserve to be spoken about truthfully and with respect." He highlighted the profound and lasting effects on families and communities, recalling that "thousands of lives were changed forever," mentioning specifically the grief borne by parents and children of those lost.

The UK’s engagement in Afghanistan began under then-Prime Minister Tony Blair, who pledged that Britain would "stand shoulder to shoulder" with the United States in the aftermath of the 9/11 attacks. British forces were prominently involved, particularly in Helmand Province, until their withdrawal in 2014. American troops remained until their withdrawal in 2021, ending the long military presence and resulting in the Taliban regaining control.

During the conflict, over 150,000 British personnel served in Afghanistan, making it the largest non-American contingent. Ben Obese-Jecty, a Member of Parliament and former captain in the Royal Yorkshire Regiment who served in Afghanistan, expressed dismay, calling it "sad to see our nation’s sacrifice, and that of our NATO partners, held so cheaply by the president of the United States."

Reaction to the president’s comments was heightened by his own history with military service eligibility. Trump did not serve in the Vietnam War, receiving a deferment for bone spurs, an issue complicated by conflicting accounts of which foot was affected, leading to accusations of draft dodging. Stephen Stewart, author chronicling British troops’ experiences in Afghanistan, described Trump’s remarks as "hugely ironic" given this background.

President Trump's downplaying of NATO contributions has not been an isolated incident. This rhetoric has coincided with his broader confrontational posture toward allies, notably his threats over Greenland and impositions of tariffs on some European countries. Such actions have strained trans-Atlantic relations despite subsequent efforts to negotiate frameworks on Arctic security with NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte.

Denmark, another NATO member heavily involved in Afghanistan, has also responded to the comments. Former Danish platoon commander Martin Tamm Andersen underscored that Denmark has been a steadfast U.S. ally, suffering the highest per capita military deaths in Afghanistan with 44 soldiers lost, along with eight in Iraq.

The emotional impact of the president’s assertions was underscored by individuals like Diane Dernie, whose son was severely injured in Afghanistan. She characterized the remarks as "the ultimate insult" and urged Prime Minister Starmer to respond firmly and support those who fought under the British flag. Starmer affirmed that, had he made such a statement, he would issue a full apology to those affected.

This controversy arises amid a week marked by significant debate over the president’s policy positions and diplomatic interactions with Europe. The tensions exposed by these remarks about NATO's Afghanistan involvement further complicate the already delicate trans-Atlantic relations.

Anders Kongshaug contributed reporting from Copenhagen, Denmark.

Risks
  • Continued strain in diplomatic relations between the United States and NATO member states could undermine alliance cohesion and collaborative defense efforts, potentially affecting geopolitical stability and defense-related sectors.
  • Public and political backlash in allied countries against U.S. leaders’ critiques of NATO commitments could impair cooperative security initiatives and joint military operations.
  • Political rhetoric minimizing coalition contributions might impact morale and veteran affairs, leading to domestic political challenges in countries with significant military involvement in coalition conflicts.
Disclosure
This analysis is based solely on reported statements and facts within the coverage of NATO's Afghanistan involvement and associated political reactions without introduction of external data or speculative content.
Search Articles
Category
News & Politics

News & Politics

Related Articles
FDA Initiates Review of BHA Food Additive Safety

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has announced plans to conduct a comprehensive reassessm...

Partisan Divide Deepens as White House Excludes Democratic Governors from NGA Meeting

The longstanding bipartisan forum of the National Governors Association (NGA) is facing disruption a...

Using Fireplace Ashes in Your Garden: Benefits and Considerations

Amidst a notably cold winter leading to increased fireplace use, many homeowners are seeking sustain...